ARCHIVE Archive

2009: Systems Engineering and Corporate Social Responsibility, Annik Magerholmm

The presentation will point out some of the sustainability challenges business are facing in the context of globalization. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is often defined as the business’ answer to environmental, economic and social challenges – the triple bottom line challenges. With the corporate focus changing from the traditional site-based concerns to a concern for the entire value chain of products and services there is a need to apply new methodologies and standards. Input-output analyses and environmental management standards have been in use for some years and businesses are becoming familiar with these tools. Waste management systems and energy saving programs are examples of these. However, when the business responsibilities widen to larger systems involving different actors along the product value chain, businesses are meeting new challenges regarding the way they are able to communicate their performance, both on the managerial level and about their products and services. A further challenge is how to communicate this downstream and at the same time require the same information from upstream sources. Tools for life cycle evaluation and guidelines on sustainability reporting and product declarations are already available and in use in larger companies. Smaller companies are still struggling with how to find the best ways for communicating their performances relative to the triple bottom line.
The presentation will demonstrate how systems engineering can be used as an approach to gather the needed information for this communication. It will further illustrate how companies can use systems engineering as an approach to identify their CSR-challenges, to address their CSR-aspects as part of their management systems, to include CSR in goals and plans, and how to use systems engineering to improve their CSR-strategies.

Annik Magerholm Fet, PhD, Professor NTNU

2009: 10 Suggested Principles for Human Factors Systems Engineering, Tom Gilb

1.Usability can be ‘engineered’ into systems.
2.Usability can be quantified.
3.Usability requirements can be quantified
4.Usability design and architecture can be quantified, estimated and measured
5.Usability levels can be measured and tested
6.Usability can be delivered incrementally
7.Usability needs depend on many parameters
8.Usability must be architected, not hacked
9.Usability must be led and driven by management as a top level requirement
10.Usability is a systems engineering discipline

Software Engineer, teacher, consultant and writer
Tom Gilb was born in Pasadena in 1940, emigrated to London 1956, and to Norway 1958, where he joined IBM for 5 years, and where he resides, and works, when not travelling extensively. He has mainly worked within the software engineering community, but since 1983 with Corporate Top Management problems, and since 1988 with large-scale systems engineering (Aircraft, Telecoms and Electronics).
He is an independent teacher, consultant and writer. He has published nine books, including the early coining of the term “Software Metrics” (1976) which is the recognized foundation ideas for IBM CMM/SEI CMM/CMMI Level 4. He wrote “Principles of Software Engineering Management” (1988, in 20th printing), and “Software Inspection” (1993, about 14th printing). Both titles are really systems engineering books in software disguise. His latest book is ‘Competitive Engineering: A Handbook for Systems Engineering, Requirements Engineering, and Software Engineering Management Using Planguage’, published by Elsevier, Summer 2005.
He is a frequent keynote speaker, invited speaker, panelist, and tutorial speaker at international conferences. He has published hundreds of papers. One paper (Laws of Unreliability, Datamation, March 1975) gave his Laws of Unreliability (over 22,000 Google hits). He has guest lectured at many dozens of universities (including U. C. Berkeley, Stanford, Seattle University, London School of Economics, University of Middlesex, University of Oslo, Technical University of Trondheim, TU Munich, Tampere and Helsinki Technical Universities, University of San Luis Obisbo, and The International Institute of Information Technology IIIT Bangalore, and many others).
He is recognized as the founder or major driver of several technical disciplines such as ‘software metrics’ and ‘evolutionary project management’, as well as being an innovative pioneer in Inspections, and the inventor of the planning language Planguage. He is directly recognized as the idea source for parts of the Agile and Extreme programming methods (primarily the incremental cycles). Tom and Kai have recently developed their own Agile Inspections and Agile Evolutionary Project Management processes, that are being successfully used by clients.
He consults and teaches in partnership with his son Kai Gilb, worldwide. He happily contributes teaching and consulting pro bono to developing countries (India, China, Russia for example), to Defense Organizations (UK, USA, Norway, NATO) and to charities (Norwegian Christian Aid and others).
He enjoys giving time to anyone, especially students, writers, consultants and teachers, who are interested in his ideas – or who have some good ideas of their own. He is a member of INCOSE (www.incose.org).
His methods are widely and officially adopted by many organizations such as IBM, Nokia, Ericsson, HP, Intel, Citigroup – and many other large and small organizations

Tom Gilb
tom@gilb.com
www.Gilb.com

2009: Understanding the Human Factor, Gerrit Muller

Frameworks offer many representations to visualize views. Unfortunately, many of these representations focus more on being complete and precise, rather than being understandable. Many of the stakeholders do insufficiently understand these representations. The designers at the same time do insufficiently understand the human factors in the system context, since most of these have been abstracted away.
We show that simple diagrams in, for instance, space and time help to bridge these two worlds and help both stakeholders and designers. We will illustrate this by examples from Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Gerrit Muller

2009 Best Student Paper: Technological Mapping and Front-end Engineering Processes, Dag Jostein

As a part of my master project in systems engineering I was investigating the front-end engineering process which includes need analysis, stakeholder identification, stakeholder requirements, concept generation and the concept selection phase. The purpose of my paper was to show a concept selection process that can be implemented in the engineering process used within FCM Technologies. As a case study it has been investigated how concepts for a new connector can be developed. The connector is used for electrical power and control between two assemblies in the subsea production system. Methods like Technological Roadmapping, Interviews and Pugh matrix are used during this process. Technology Roadmapping is a technique that provides a form of technology planning which is useful in dealing with increasingly competitive environments. Technology Roadmapping should be utilized to establish a benchmark of engineering complexity and development to produce the optimum solution. The proposal for the front-end engineering process was found to be adaptable in different levels of technology development.

Dag Jostein

2010 Keynote: Systems Engineering Research and Transformation, Dinesh Verma

Speaker: Dinesh Verma, Stevens

Presentation: Dinesh Verma-KSEE Keynote

Systems Engineering Research

There is an increasing interest in systems engineering as an enabler for developing systems and solutions in response to the systemic challenges facing society.  Traditional science and technology organizations in the US (e.g., DARPA, National Science Foundation) are also developing coherent research agendas in this space with a particular focus on understanding and embracing complexity; understanding and modeling flexibility and adaptability in architectures and design; and developing effective capabilities more rapidly.  The recently established Systems Engineering Research Center, a consortium of 18 universities is yet another example of this emphasis.   This presentation will articulate the research context and strategy developed by Stevens in response to today’s systemic challenges.

About Dinesh Verma

Dinesh Verma recieved the Ph.D. and the M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech.  He is currently serving as Dean of the School of Systems and Enterprises and Professor in Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology, concurrently he serves as the Executive Director of the Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC), a US Department of Defense sponsored University Affiliated Research Center (UARC) focused on systems engineering research.

During his seven years at Stevens he has successfully proposed research and academic programs exceeding $50m in value.  Verma concurrently serves as Scientific Advisor to the Director of the Embedded Systems Institute in Eindhoven, Holland.  Prior to this role, he served as Technical Director at Lockheed Martin Undersea Systems, in Manassas, Virginia, in the area of adapted systems and supportability engineering processes, methods and tools for complex system development and integration.

Before joining Lockheed Martin, Verma worked as a Research Scientist at Virginia Tech and managed the University’s Systems Engineering Design Laboratory.  While at Virginia Tech and afterwards, Verma continues to serve numerous companies in a consulting capacity, to include Eastman Kodak, Lockheed Martin Corporation, L3 Communications, United Defense, Raytheon, IBM Corporation, Sun Microsystems, SAIC, VOLVO Car Corporation (Sweden), NOKIA (Finland), RAMSE (Finland), TU Delft (Holland), Johnson Controls, Ericsson-SAAB Avionics (Sweden), Varian Medical Systems (Finland), and Motorola.  He served as an Invited Lecturer from 1995 through 2000 at the University of Exeter, United Kingdom.  His professional and research activities emphasize systems engineering and design with a focus on conceptual design evaluation, preliminary design and system architecture, design decision-making, life cycle costing, and supportability engineering.  In addition to his publications, Verma has received two patents and has another pending in the areas of life-cycle costing and fuzzy logic techniques for evaluating design concepts.

Dr. Verma has authored over 100 technical papers, book reviews, technical monographs, and co-authored two textbooks: Maintainability: A Key to Effective Serviceability and Maintenance Management (Wiley, 1995), and Economic Decision Analysis (Prentice Hall, 1998).  He is a co-Editor of a textbook on Space Systems Engineering (McGraw Hill, 2009).  He is a Fellow of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), a senior member of SOLE, and was elected to Sigma Xi, the honorary research society of America.  He serves as on the Core Curriculum Committee of the Delft University’s Space Systems Engineering Program (Holland).  He was honored with an Honorary Doctorate Degree (Honoris Causa) in Technology and Design from Växjö University (Sweden) in January 2007.

Gunnar Berge

Steering Committee Member
Email: gunnar.kristian.berge@hibu.no
Tlf: 414 941 37

Industry Professor Systems Engineering

After receiving a BSc Hons. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Glasgow, Gunnar received his Master in Systems Engineering from Polytechnic Institute of New York. He had started to work towards a PhD in SE, when he left for ComComp Inc., Long Island, as Director of Research.

He worked at  Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk and Kongsberg Defence&Aerospace for three decades, as Development Manager, Project Manager, Product Manager and Vice President Space and Avionics,practising SE,  before retiring from Industry. He then  joined the BUC team to build up the Systems Engineering Masters Program, in cooperation with Stevens Institute of Technology.

2010: Systems Engineering Challenges in KDA, Harald Ånnestad

Speaker:  Harald Ånnestad, KDA

Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace is Norway’s premier supplier of defence and aerospace-related systems. The portfolio includes advanced systems for command and control, weapons guidance and surveillance, communications, missiles and Space products. The advanced systems require world-class competence in a wide variety of subjects ranging from electronics, SW and mechanics to thermodynamics and aerodynamics. To get all the subject matter experts to work together, find the correct compromises and thereby produce world-class products which efficiently solves the customers requirements, requires the best available System Engineers. The requirements to the system engineers in Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace is high very and one of the most demanding positions in the company. Availability of skilled system engineers are the most limiting factor for expansion, both within Kongsberg’s existing product portfolio and for expansion into new areas.

The presentation will give some examples of systems made by Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace, some System Engineering challenges solved to realize our projects. The most important skills and the requirements posed to our System Engineers will also be covered.
President, Kongsberg Defence Systems

Harald Ånnestad is President of Kongsberg Defence Systems, a Business Unit within KONGSBERG GRUPPEN ASA (KONGSBERG).

KONGSBERG is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange (OSE:KOG) and is a leading technology corporation specializing in defense, aerospace, maritime and offshore oil and gas technologies. The corporation operates world wide and has offices in more than 25 countries. KONGSBERG reported sales of 13.8 billion NOK in 2009 and has about 5400 employees world wide.

Kongsberg Defence Systems is Norway’s premier supplier of defence and aerospace-related systems. The portfolio comprises products and systems for command and control, weapons guidance and surveillance, communications solutions, missiles, Space products and services and advanced composites and engineering products for the aircraft and helicopter market.

Since joining KONGSBERG in 1986 working as a Project Engineer on Air Defence systems, Ånnestad has held various positions of increasing responsibility. In 1989 he was the lead Systems Engineer on the definition of the NASAMS system, and has later had several technical and managerial positions within Air Defence programs, before he was appointed Executive Vice President of Integradet Air Defence Systems Division.

Prior to this assignment, Ånnestad was Executive Vice President for the Missile Systems Division. In this role he was responsible for the Naval Strike Missile, Joint Strike Missile, Penguin, Space and Aero-structures programs.

Ånnestad graduated from the Norwegian University of Technology in Trondheim, Norway in 1984 and holds a Master of Science in Engineering Cybernetics.

Gerrit Muller, PhD.


KSEE 2009 Project Manager
Email: gerrit.muller@gmail.com

Professor Buskerud University College
Gerrit Muller, originally from the Netherlands, received his Master’s degree in physics from the University of Amsterdam in 1979. He worked from 1980 until 1997 at Philips Medical Systems as a system architect, followed by two years at ASML as a manager of systems engineering, returning to Philips (Research) in 1999. Since 2003 he has worked as a senior research fellow at the Embedded Systems Institute in Eindhoven, focusing on developing system architecture methods and the education of new system architects, receiving his doctorate in 2004. In January 2008 he became a full professor of systems engineering at Buskerud University College in Kongsberg, Norway.
All information (System Architecture articles, course material, curriculum vitae) can be found at: Gaudí systems architecting

2010: The PROTECTOR RWS product and its Productification, Pål Andersen

Speaker:  Pål Andersen, KPS

Presentation: Pål Andersen-PROTECTOR at KSEE 2010

Topics to be covered:  The Company, The Product, The Challenges, The path forward

Kongsberg Protech Systems, A Business Area of Kongsberg Gruppen, 2009 revenue of 4 123 MNOK, and EBITA of 442 MNOK,  568 employees (31/12-2009), Revenue 7.3 MNOK/employee

Offices/factories in: Kongsberg (Norway), Johnstown, Pennsylvania (USA), Alexandria Virginia (USA), Mt Arlington, New Jersey (USA), London, Ontario (Canada), License production at Thales UK (Scotland)

Why a Remote Weapon Station? The ”Problem” and the ”Answer”

PROTECTOR at KSEE 2010

Pål Andersen is Director Product Development, Kongsberg Protech Systems

Pål holds a Master of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering (Materials & Processes) from the Norwegian Institute of Technology (now NTNU). He graduated in 1990.

After performing his military services in the Norwegian Navy Material Command, he started his professional work in Norsk Forsvarsteknologi, NFT (predecessor of Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace, KDA). His tasks in NFT/KDA were mainly design and management of activities related to the Navel Strike Missile, space components and defence related products. He also managed a 3 year internal improvement program (Integrated Product Realization) which focused on implementation of Concurrent Engineering, lean processes and installation of computer tools such as Product Data Management.

In 1998 he started working as Pre-sales in SAP,  a world leading SW company where his main tasks were to support Account managers with sales based on his experience with project management, engineering management etc. In addition to applications for Project Management, PDM and Sales, he was involved in internet applications like e-procurement, portals.

In 2002 he returned to Kongsberg Protech a subsidiary of Kongsberg Gruppen working with Remote Weapon Stations. Since then he has held various positions in the program and development department. Pål has been central in the development and sales of the world-leading product PROTECTOR Remote Weapon Station.

Ole Hoen

KSEE Steering Committee Member
Volvo Aero Norge, Manager Technology, R&D
Email: ole.hoen@volvo.com